Page 21 - Lohgarh
P. 21

Introduction w 21


                          the present districts of Yamuna Nagar, Ambala and Panchkula, is not
                          more than 250 years old. In 1852, the Bristish Government appointed
                          the first consolidation officer Kale Rai (Rangar) for reinhabitation of
                          population in the said area.
                              Some historians have wrongly stated that the Lohgarh Fort was a
                          new name given to the already existing Muklishgarh Fort (which was, in
                          fact, not a Fortress, but was ‘Rang Mahal’ i.e. palace of joy of the Mughal
                          Emperors and generals). The mighty Lohgarh Fort was falsely and
                          fictitiously projected as Mukhlispur simply to dilute the glorified history
                          of the Lohgarh Fort, which was constructed by the natives to uproot
                          the alien and oppressive rule of the Mughals. Muklishgarh is situated
                          near Hathni Kund Barrage and is approximately 35 km away from
                          Lohgarh Fort. The contemporary Mughal historians like Khafi Khan,
                          Mohammed Qasim Aurangabadi and others deliberately projected a
                          wrong picture of Lohgarh as Muklishgarh. Later on, Alexander
                          Cunningham, who was a British army engineer with the Bengal Engineer
                          Group, held an interest in the history and archaeology of India. In 1861,
                          he was appointed to the newly created position of the Archaeological
                          Surveyor to the Government of India, and, he founded and recorded
                          (what later became Archaeological Survey of India). He also surveyed
                          this area, but he, too, deliberately, never submitted any report on
                          Lohgarh. He even wrote a note on the Sikh history, but never made any
                          true reference to Lohgarh Fort. All the later historians picked references in
                          its context from the above cited authors, thus got a faulty interpretation
                          of the history of Banda Singh Bahadur, the battles of Lohgarh, the
                          Vanjaras and the Sikligars.
                              The British Gazetteer of the territorial dominion of old Ambala,
                          published in 1893, makes no reference of the Fort of Lohgarh, though
                          the British Gazetteer of district Saharanpur, makes a reference to
                          Muklishgarh (the pleasure palace of the Mughals). After the Britishers
                          occupied this area in the middle of the 19th century, the British surveyors
                          like Cunningham, Irvine and W. Crooke were appointed to do research
                          on the Vanjaras. It appears that these surveyors presented adverse
                          reports against the Vanjaras (who uprooted the Mughals Empire). To
   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26